On your bike! Cycling AT work to reduce adverse health conditions for professional men

Posted on: 14 October 2021

Researchers at Trinity’s Institute of Population Health have assessed the acceptability and feasibility of a gender-sensitive multicomponent intervention, to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour by increasing physical activity in professional men in the work-place.

Researchers at Trinity’s Institute of Population Health have assessed the acceptability and feasibility of a gender-sensitive multicomponent intervention, to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour by increasing physical activity in professional men in the work-place.

Professional male office employees have been identified as those most at risk of prolonged sedentary time, which is associated with many long-term adverse health conditions. Prospective studies on sedentary behaviour (SB) have indicated that longer time spent being sedentary is associated with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality, and type 2 diabetes.

Now researchers at Trinity’s Institute of Population Health have assessed the acceptability and feasibility of a gender-sensitive multicomponent intervention, to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour by increasing physical activity in professional men. The findings are published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

On average, per day, we spend more than seven hours being sedentary, and for most adults, sedentary behaviour mainly occurs in the office workplace. This behaviour puts our health at risk, and the evidence shows that sedentary behaviour is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease and cancers and may lead to a higher risk of death.

In particular, workplace sitting appears to be associated with a higher risk of developing pancreatic, lung and breast cancers. Workplace interventions may be important strategies in our efforts to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity in those who are most at risk. Multiple short bouts of physical activity (rather than long exercise sessions) are likely to be practical and acceptable in the workplace, and evidence suggests that these short sharp bouts of exercise may actually benefit us more.

Although the root causes of occupational SB are similar for both genders (i.e.: restrictive workstations and the traditional workplace culture of remaining seated for long periods), when you look at intervention participation, men are especially difficult to recruit to health promotion interventions.

The office workplace offers several advantages as a setting for interventions to reduce daily SB due to the opportunity to reach a large working population, and where multiple influences that promote SB can be targeted.

The research team recruited twenty-two office-based employees from two professional worksites in Dublin, who were each provided with a Garmin watch and the associated web-based/smartphone application, Garmin Connect. An under-desk pedal machine was also provided for the duration of the intervention. Managers were recruited to provide support to the employees.

Summary of findings

  • Twenty-two men were recruited with an average age of 43 years.
  • Overall, participants found that the intervention was acceptable, feasible and enjoyable, despite some problems with setting up the under-desk pedal machines.
  • The intervention reduced daily workplace SB by 27 minutes.
  • Overall, SB was reduced by 47 minutes in a full day.
  • 67% of participants engaged in >20 min of pedalling per day, which equated to >60% of the intervention pedalling goal.
  • The social group influence was important in terms of changing normative behaviours.
  • Managers described a positive impact on the social environment and communicative aspects of work as a result of the intervention components.

The findings of this study provide insight into the challenges and opportunities associated with the workplace, and this intervention should be further tested in a larger randomised controlled trial. This could provide practical, real-world solutions to improve population health.

Gail Nicolson, PhD at the School of Medicine, Trinity College and lead author said:

The Cycle at Work intervention has the potential to change workers’ behaviour by increasing light physical activity. This study should now be expanded to include different occupations and settings and should prioritise those who are least active. Future studies should also look at how well this novel intervention would reduce sedentary behaviour in women.

Given that the typical workplace is highly sedentary in nature, and that employees and organisations have the authority to implement their own policies, the ‘Cycle at Work’ intervention has the potential to effect real change. This multicomponent intervention could be offered to both employers and employees as part of a wider culture of wellness.

 

Media Contact:

Ciara O’Shea, Media Relations Officer | coshea9@tcd.ie | +353 1 896 4337